Gear Reviews

Gear Review: Lucid HD7 Red Dot Sight (and magnifier)

IMG_0553So I recently built an AR-15. I don’t remember but I might have written a couple of posts on it. Maybe a video or two

Anyway, after getting it finished, I had slapped some pop-up iron sights on it then set out to find a nice red dot sight. If you’ve ever priced a red dot sight, they’re not cheap. Ok, some of them are cheap but therein lies the problem. After dumping all this money into the gun, I didn’t have a hefty sum of cash for an EOTech or Aimpoint. I did, however, find a generic red dot at a gun show for $70. Score!

As it turns out…no…not “score”. I could not get this thing to zero to save my life. I finally gave up and said “for now I’ll just aim 2 feet above the target”. That’s not ideal by any stretch of the imagination. It looked like I was going to have to start saving a bunch of cash for an EOTech.

I was complaining about my poor purchase to TJ when he suggested I look into the Lucid HD7. I had never heard of it before but he said he loved his so I checked it out. My first stop was Amazon. The price was good at under $300 ($279 + shipping, in this case). Even more importantly, it was pretty much universally loved in the customer review section. That’s almost unheard of at Amazon. I wasn’t able to order it immediately but it was at the top of my wish list. I finally put in the order recently and now hold it in my grubby little hands.

So let’s talk about it for a moment…  Continue reading


Like what you read?  GunNoob is now part of Pew Pew Tactical.  Check out the rest of our awesome resources:

Gear Review: LaserLyte Laser Training System (LTS)

1A great way to improve your shooting is to shoot. The best way to improve your shooting is to shoot well. You could go to a range every day, close your eyes and blast through a magazine full of rounds while holding the gun gangsta style and never improve one tiny bit. If you go to a range every day, slow things down, make sure that every aspect of your shot is right every time you shoot, there is no way you won’t improve. This puts the fundamentals of shooting (stance, grip, sight picture, trigger control) at the utmost importance.

Wait…check that…safety is the utmost importance. The fundamentals are second. Back to the review…

Let me preface everything I say moving forward with the following statement (which will be reiterated multiple times): Nothing can possibly substitute for range time. There is nothing you can do to avoid the range if your goal is to be even an acceptable shooter, not just an awesome shooter. Got it? Good.

The problem is that ammo is expensive right now, difficult to find and ranges are crowded. It makes things difficult to get the practice we want. Dry fire practice is ok but it still leaves out that needed feedback of “would that shot have hit anything?”, which is the ultimate goal of shooting.

Enter LaserLyte with their “LaserLyte Training System”. The LTS system is made up of two components: a laser that fits inside of the gun and a target that detects the laser beam. LaserLyte offer two options for the target: a larger target for stationary bulleye shooting and also a recently released “LTS ReactionTyme” target which consists of two very small targets that are made to test reaction time and dynamic targeting. This review, however, pertains only to the standard LTS Target.   Continue reading


Like what you read?  GunNoob is now part of Pew Pew Tactical.  Check out the rest of our awesome resources:

Retro Review: Enfield Number 4, Mk II

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAWhen it comes to old battle rifles, the Garand, Mauser and Mosin tend to get all the love, but ever since the day I first saw the movie, “Breaker Morant,” I’ve wanted an Enfield. It was the first bolt-action, multi-round battle rifle the British ever fielded, and they continued to field it in one form or another until well after the Korean War. Think about that for a second. That would be like instead of the M1 Garand going to shore at Inchon in 1950, U.S. Soldiers carrying the same Krag-Jorgensen rifles Teddy Roosevelt carried up San Juan Hill in the Spanish American War. It wasn’t until the FN FAL came along that the British switched to a semi-automatic, and even then Enfields were retained as sniper rifles. Until just last year, Enfields were used in the far north by Canadian Rangers because they worked better in the freezing temperatures than the Canadian C7 rifles. It’s just, simply put, a great bolt-action rifle, and you can still find them out there. Continue reading


Like what you read?  GunNoob is now part of Pew Pew Tactical.  Check out the rest of our awesome resources:

Gear Review: 5.11 Tactical Range Ready Bag

IMG_3474So I recently completed another trip around the sun (translation: birthday). As is tradition, my dog bought me a gift (translation: I bought myself something and said Ms. Pepper got it for me). For some reason, she has a knack for finding that one thing that no one else knew that I wanted. I guess it’s true: no one knows you like your best friend.

So this year’s present was the Range Ready Bag from 5.11 Tactical. My old range bag was…old. It also wasn’t really meant for use as a range bag. It was for bringing sporting clay supplies to the range. It was essentially a stiff sided gym bag, when all was said and done so there was no real way to organize anything in it. As I started to bring more and more things to the range with me, trying to find what I needed in the bag became nearly impossible. Continue reading


Like what you read?  GunNoob is now part of Pew Pew Tactical.  Check out the rest of our awesome resources:

Guest Post: 5.11 Tactical Women’s Taclite Pro Pants Review

womenstacliteOk, so I finally caved and let the Noob buy me a pair of Taclite Pro women’s pants from 5.11 Tactical. Like the Noob, I have an absurd fondness for cargo pants. I own several pairs of them that are meant to be more fashionable than functional. They’re “cute” pants. Unfortunately, that means the pockets look nice, but don’t really have much room in which to put stuff.  Continue reading


Like what you read?  GunNoob is now part of Pew Pew Tactical.  Check out the rest of our awesome resources:

Gear Review: J. Dewey Manufacturing Cleaning Kit

cleaningKitGo down to Wal-Mart and take a look at a cleaning kit for your pistol. Go ahead, I’ll wait…

Seriously, go on. I’ll be here when you get back.

All done? Great. Let’s talk about what was in it. You’ve got a pile of wire brushes, right? One for just about every caliber out there it seems. You’ve got a cleaning rod that can be configured at various lengths. Probably some cotton cleaning thingies as well as a loop so you can push cleaning patches through the barrel. You’ve also got a little bottle of cleaner. Not bad, reader, not bad. Here’s my big question: how many of those brushes and such are you actually going to use? Look at me, for example. Up until recently I only had 3 pistols and they were all 9mm. Why would I need all these extra doohickeys when I was only going to use one brush?

I really hate wasting things.   Continue reading


Like what you read?  GunNoob is now part of Pew Pew Tactical.  Check out the rest of our awesome resources:

From Tacticool to Practicool: The Pistol Bayonet

bayonetEvery so often you come across something someone’s done to a gun purely as a joke, like the guy who puts an Ace bottle opener on their AR15 to stay hydrated. He shows it off in a YouTube video and everyone has a good laugh. That’s pretty much what I figured when I first saw a pistol bayonet.  The only conclusion I could come to was that someone modified their pistol for a bayonet as a gag and in a horrible turn of events that spun out of their control, someone took it seriously and ran with it, leaving the original gun owner absolutely mortified with the Pandora’s Box they had opened. It doesn’t help that some of the more influential voices in the world of young people getting into guns makes attempts to show it as somehow useful.

Thanks for nothing, Call of Duty 3!

Believe it or not, the pistol bayonet has a historical precedent. Sailors would carry them on raiding parties because when you’re in the bowels of a cramped ship with no room to draw a sword and your pistol only carries one shot, it helps to have a Plan B. But that Plan B became less and less necessary when pistols started carrying more rounds and didn’t take five minutes to reload. The same thing occurred with rifle bayonets over the years as rifles became easier to reload and shorter in length. It used to be a bayonet on the end of a rifle made perfect sense because the rifle itself was already as long as a spear, troops were already massed in large, tight formations in order to concentrate firepower, and in the middle of a close-in fight, you couldn’t call a time-out to reload for five minutes.  While some modern rifles still have bayonet lugs, they’re almost never used in combat.

size0-army.mil-63465-2010-02-04-120247

The last U.S. Army bayonet charge was in 1951 (though the British were bayoneting people as late as 2009). But even though they’re not used as much, bayonets for rifles still make some sense, whereas a bayonet on a pistol makes me wonder what the hell is wrong with people. Explain to me the scenario where this thing will be used as it’s intended. I’ve only seen them advertised on automatics, so let’s assume the shooter using it has at least 10rounds in the magazine. (FOAD, California!). What possible situation are you going to be in where you run through 10rounds in a magazine, possibly 10 rounds in another, and instead of escaping you’re closing with someone to bayonet them with your Glock?  For Chrissakes, this is the Orange Park Mall not Rorke’s Drift!

There’s also a safety aspect to think about, if patent absurdity isn’t enough to dissuade you. By putting this thing on the front of your pistol you now have all the safety concerns of a pistol added to the safety concerns of an unsheathed razor to contend with.  I’ve been looking on the internet to see what other people have been saying about this thing, and some of the stuff I’ve seen makes me fearful for the people who interact with them on a regular basis. One guy lamented that he wasn’t sure which Airsoft gun he was going to put his on.

Read that again. He put a razor sharp bayonet on the end of a TOY that he runs through the forest with and uses to engage in simulated combat with his FRIENDS. You know how your mom always told you not to run with scissors? I’m pretty sure the basic principle underpinning that lesson transfers readily to sharp %&^*ing knives.

What to get instead: A light or a laser

Believe it or not, the rail below the barrel of your new pistol has a purpose beyond comic relief, and the options for it are quite practical, particularly for new shooters. While a flashlight or a laser isn’t quite as dangerous as a knife, you could make “vroooo vroooo KSHHHHH!” noises and pretend it’s alight saber, though I and all of your neighbors would beg you to make sure it’s unloaded first.

Lights

Weapon lights and I have an uncomfortable relationship. I have a family situation wherein having an adrenaline-pumped me pointing my light in the same direction as my weapon isn’t ideal in the most likely situation I would use it for its intended purpose. However, I do believe it’s a good resource for those who don’t share that situation. A single person living alone who hears something strange downstairs in the middle of the night would benefit from having a light on their weapon, allowing them to have one hand free for opening doors or operating light switches. Lights have become so prevalent in the firearms community that they can be found just about everywhere.

Lasers

Despite what The Terminator and Cobra have taught us, a laser isn’t a one-to-one trade-off for sights, but it does have its uses,particularly when dealing with low-light conditions where the shooter may be amped up.

Laser

Have you ever tried to aim with iron sights in the dark? It’s a bitch, ain’t it? A laser ameliorates this somewhat by putting the dot in the approximate area your bullet is going to go and the best part is you can see it in the dark, a distinct possibility for anyone who’s purchased a gun with the fear they may have to use it at home in the middle of the night.  While some have said a laser is a two-way street, the idea that someone can find you by following the laser has been pretty much debunked. It’s not ideal for every circumstance, but for this situation it’s a good fit.

I dislike the entire pistol bayonet concept for a variety of reasons. One is practicality. Are you going to carry this thing around with the blade attached or wait until you’re getting mugged, yell “fix bayonets!” and hook it onto your gun while your would-be mugger stares at you in slack-jawed fascination?

The second is simple safety. For the most part I believe all care should be made to make guns safer for the user and more dangerous for the assailant. Sticking a knife on the end of a gun isn’t going to make the user safer and probably more of the opposite. I’ve carried knives on me since I was 13. You know how many times I’ve stabbed an attacker? Zero. You know how many times I’ve stabbed myself? Holy crap!Break out the abacus ‘cause we’re going to be here awhile.

Look, if you want to learn to use a gun, learn to use a gun.If you want to learn to use a knife, learn to use a knife. Not everything goes together like toast and jam. Sometimes it’s just toast and chapstick. Sure, I could make the stretch in logic that eating toast while protecting my lips from the elements is a good idea, but why would you even want to try?


Like what you read?  GunNoob is now part of Pew Pew Tactical.  Check out the rest of our awesome resources:

From Tacticool to Practicool: The Fake Suppressor

There’s a tendency among shooters to want the best gear, and there’s nothing wrong with that. One doesn’t walk into a car dealership and demand to see their shittiest compact, after all, and shooters are no different. For the most part, people want to outfit themselves with quality equipment, and for better or worse, the barometer of quality gear is the military. This is a fallacy for a number of reasons.

  1. Military equipment is geared toward a specific purpose that 99% of people will never see.
  2. The military has passed on acquiring great pieces of kit due to price or politics.
  3. The military makes stupid decisions.

Number 3 is kind of subjective, but if you need evidence just look at the latest fiasco wherein the military spent $5 Billion dollars on camouflage that makes Soldiers easier to see.

030709-F-3050V-073

The end result of this thinking is that people go out and buy stuff for their weapons because it’s “milspec” even though “mispec” will do absolutely nothing for them. A person who does this obsessively is commonly referred to as a “mall ninja.”  This is the guy who puts a long-range scope on his 16-inch AR and only shoots it at a 100-yard range.  The guy who buys a plate carrier and no plate.

And believe me, it’s hard to keep yourself from buying the latest gadgets for your rifle. They make so many scopes now!  With so many dots! Some are green and some are red! And it has RAILS! You can put a scope on top of another scope!  HOW CAN YOU MISS WITH TWO SCOPES?! YOU CAN’T! IT’S A MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY!!!

Then you look at the price tag attached to your new super scope, and you realize you’ve made a horrible mistake. “Two scopes?! What the &*%$ was I thinking? You can’t hit anything with two scopes! It’s a mathematical impossibility!”

“But, TJ, you condescending %&*$#, who gives a crap what we put on our rifles?” you ask. And the answer is “no one but you.” If you’re military or LEO and you live in that tactical world, this isn’t for you. If you want something because it looks cool, then nothing I say will change your mind. This new series of articles is for the people who are just getting into firearms and their exposure to what good gear is comes from movies, video games or the internet. Because you shouldn’t feel like you have to spend a lot of money for something you’re not going to use or use to its potential.  So we’re going to kick this off with what I feel is the most egregious example of mall ninjitsu, the fake suppressor.

Now, look, there is a lot, and I mean A LOT of “tacticool” gear out there, but the saving grace of 99% of them is that they at least serve some actual purpose.  I may not need a quad-rail handguard on my AR, but at least it performs a role holding stuff. A fake suppressor, on the other hand, is like motorcycle helmet made of paper mache. It LOOKS like a helmet, but when the time comes to protect my bean from the ravages of the open road it doesn’t even do a proper job of holding the pieces of my skull together for the paramedics who must now deal with the added inconvenience of finding them all.

Now, a real suppressor is a good piece of kit to have. It’s better on the ears, and in the states where you can hunt with them, you can take an animal without scaring off every other piece of game for three miles. The problem is they’re expensive and you have to have ATF’s permission to have one in the form of a tax stamp, and that can take ages. So, instead, people put a fake suppressor on their rifles, usually AR15s. It doesn’t make the retort any less loud. It doesn’t hide muzzle flash. The best you can say is that the weight of this metal cylinder on the end of your rifle helps with muzzle rise. It’s like instead of having a spoiler put on your car, you have a vanity plate that says “SPOILER.”  I’ve heard of some people having fake suppressors permanently fixed to their short-barreled rifles in order to get around those pesky laws mandating that rifles be of a certain barrel length, but sweet monkey Jesus!

Let me get this straight. You wanted a short-barreled rifle, but since for whatever legal reason you can’t have a short-barreled rifle you extended the length of your barrel by welding a fake suppressor onto the end of your gun. The end result is a rifle with a longer barrel that behaves like a short barrel (as the fake suppressor isn’t rifled).

Now call me stupid, but I think I just would have bought a longer rifle to begin with.

I’ve seen these things being sold online for as much as $125. That’s $125 for a block of metal that makes your barrel longer with no net benefit.

silencer

But if you HAVE to get one…get the best one out there.  This one is from Spike’s and costs about $40.

Spike's Fake Suppressor

Spike’s Fake Suppressor

What to get instead

Okay, you want your AR to look cool. I get that. But you also want it to be useful. And if you’re not going to shell out the cash and time to get a real suppressor, you should probably just get a new flash suppressor/compensator. Within the same price range as a fake suppressor you can get something that screws onto the end of your AR with an actual function. And with the wide breadth of designs out there, you can get something that also makes your rifle look nice. A compensator diverts gasses from the muzzle to help “push” the barrel down as you fire, cutting down on recoil and muzzle rise. A flash suppressor hides the muzzle flash from your rifle, meaning that if you’re shooting at that damn raccoon who keeps coming up on your porch in the dead of night, you’re not blinding yourself with a big flash of light on the first shot. You can buy them separately, or for a little extra you can get something that does both, and they’re only about an inch long.

There’s tactical and then there’s tacticool. The difference between them is practicality. For the no-kidding operators out there who really do jump out of planes and conduct special operations, tactical is practical. For those of us who don’t, it’s not. It’s tacticool. It’s mostly harmless, but it can be expensive. Julius Caesar was said to have a servant stand next to him during speeches to whisper the words, “You are not a god,” into his ear as the crowd cheered him to keep his feet on the ground. I sometimes think it would be nice while I’m browsing at the gun store if my wife would whisper, “You are not an operator,” into mine.

Keep shooting.

TJ


Like what you read?  GunNoob is now part of Pew Pew Tactical.  Check out the rest of our awesome resources:

Why-dex?

M&Pc-Two-Tone-1_smSo, presumably you are here because you have a gun or are thinking about buying a gun.  This is good.  You are taking steps in the right direction.  Welcome to The Magical World of Firearms Ownership, where the sun is always shining and butterflies and unicorns romp in the meadows.  (That’s right, I said “romp”. WHAT?).

Now we should to talk about how you are going to carry your gun.  First, you need to make sure that you are following all of the proper procedures for your state including obtaining a Concealed Carry Weapons License, if necessary.  Once you have that license, you’ll need a holster to carry your gun in.  There are many holster options available.  Not all holsters are ideal for all guns.  Some are better than others.  I’m assuming you are reading this because you are smart and you’re doing your research, which is exactly what you should do when you are looking to buy a holster.

If you’ve done any shopping at all for a holster so far, you’ve probably run into the word “Kydex”.  In case you are unfamiliar, Kydex is a thermoplastic sheet product. It has a number of industrial applications in fields like aviation, health care and mass transit.  It is also remarkably well suited for making holsters and knife sheaths due to its strength, durability and chemical and flame resistance.  Holster-makers also like the crisp detail achievable in the molding process both for the aesthetics and superior retention of the firearm.

Kydex also offers distinct advantages over a leather or nylon holster since it doesn’t deform or compress over time. This means that the shape of the holster won’t change, so you can be assured that your gun will always be where you it need it to be.  The rigidity of the material makes Kydex holsters good training tools also. You’ll get the same draw and re-holster every time, which can help you improve the consistency of your movements. Considering the retention properties and ease of use, if you’re going to be training aggressively or just moving around a lot with your gun, a well-made Kydex holster could be a good choice for you.  Additionally, Kydex quite is durable, making it a perfect choice for hard wear-and-tear activities.  And since it’s plastic, you can basically just hose it down with soap and water when you’re done.  This is a distinct advantage over other types of holsters, which may be difficult or impossible to clean.

The downside of Kydex is that it can become uncomfortable in certain positions or after a long period of time, since it is so inflexible.  This can be especially unpleasant during an extended car ride, when your holster and the car seat can engage each other in an epic fight to the death, in which your back and side will be the main casualties.

There is also the issue of body type to be considered.  A leather holster is going to conform to your individual shape as you wear it, but a Kydex holster will pretty much be the same shape forever.  There is a certain amount of flex in the plastic, especially if it’s made from a thinner sheet of Kydex like .08 or .06 thickness.  If you are wearing your holster on a heavy duty gun belt (which you should), when you tighten it up, your holster will flex slightly and snug down to your body.  However, it’s never really going to “break in” the way a leather holster would.  Mostly, this is a matter of personal preference and just getting the right tool for the job.

If you decide that you want to take the plunge and get yourself a Kydex holster, some of the big names you might want to check out are Raven Concealment Systems, Blade-Tech and Comp-Tac. These companies all make perfectly functional holsters, though personally, I don’t think they are the prettiest ladies at the ball.  Luckily, there’s been a flood of smaller companies that have recently cropped up to accommodate the demand for custom-made Kydex holsters with more of an eye towards design and comfort.  Some of my favorites are GunFightersInc., Sentry Gun Leather, MultiHolsters and PHLster.  In the interest of full disclosure, I should mention that I actually work for PHLster.  This means I am biased, but it also means I spend a lot of time around Kydex, talking about, testing and helping to design holsters.  I know the benefits and the disadvantages of carrying a Kydex holster.

Here are some things I think you should consider when shopping for a holster:

What are you planning on using the holster for?  Is it an every day carry holster or will you be using it just at the range or in your home?  If it’s going to be your EDC holster, can you wear it in a way that is comfortable, concealable and secure?

Is a Kydex holster the best bet for your particular firearm?  Since it is a relatively hard plastic, a Kydex holster can wear the finish on your gun over time.  Are you ok with that?  Personally, I run my M&Ps in Kydex all the time, but my Kimber Raptor has never seen the inside of a Kydex holster and never will.  In other words, if you’re looking for something to carry your amazingly gorgeous Ed Brown Custom 1911 in, I would pass on the Kydex.

And finally, if you are going to be ordering a custom holster, are you confident that you are getting what you want?  Oftentimes, when buying a custom holster you are ordering based solely on photos you’ve seen on a website.  If you have the opportunity to examine and try on some holsters in real life, do that first.  It will give you a better idea of what you want and make the ordering process much smoother.

Ask a lot of questions, even if they seem obvious.  I spend a lot of time at PHLster answering emails and I would much rather have 20+ email exchanges with you than send you a holster that you won’t be happy with.  Knowledge is paramount in the firearms community, whether it be about safety, training, gear or guns themselves.

If you have questions or want to talk to me more about holsters or Kydex or guns or unicorns, you can email me at rebeccaguns@gunnoob.com.  Also, check out PHLster.com for awesome stuff.  Happy holstering!


Like what you read?  GunNoob is now part of Pew Pew Tactical.  Check out the rest of our awesome resources:

What’s a scout rifle and do I need one?

In the 1970s, Col. Jeff Cooper, a rifleman’s rifleman if there ever was one, pioneered the idea of a general purpose rifle that would work in a variety of roles from hunting to defense. The concept was dubbed “the scout rifle,” and Cooper refined it over the years until his death in 2006. Cooper believed in the “scout,” a man who “acted alone, not as a member of a team. By choice he did not fight, but he had to be an expert at the hit-and-run art of single combat. By choice he did not shoot, but if forced to shoot, he shot quickly, carefully, and as little a possible. ‘One round, one hit and then vanish!’ – that was his motto. He did not need an assault rifle. He needed a scout rifle.”

Cooper caption

So Cooper set out to create the perfect rifle for this man. Now, this isn’t ‘Nam, this is scout rifles… there are rules, rules so stringent that not even Ruger’s Gunsite Scout, designed with help from people at Gunsite who knew and worked with Jeff Cooper, lives up to Cooper’s vision. I’m not talking about the political “if it has a magazine, it’s an assault rifle,” kind of rule, either, where they’re deliberately vague. Cooper’s vision was specific for very specific reasons.

  • It’s a bolt-action rifle.
  • It’s ideal weight is 6.6 pounds, but can be as heavy as 7.7 pounds, and that’s with the scope and sling.
  • It’s a meter long or less.
  • It’s barrel should be about 19 inches.
  • It should have a low-powered, low-mounted, long eye relief scope placed forward of the action.
  • Ghost ring iron sights are not required, but are preferred.
  • It should have a fast loop up sling.
  • The preferred caliber is .308 Winchester, though other calibers can be used if more power is required. A .243 can be used if the shooter is frail, but .308 is considered the minimum for power.
  • It has to shoot a four-inch group at 200 meters.

Not so easy to find now, is it? Cooper’s requirements come for good reasons. A bolt-action rifle is typically lighter than a semi-auto and less prone to failures. It has to be light-weight because whoever’s using it is running through the wilderness with it for long periods of time. It needs to be short enough to not snag on brush as you’re walking, but the barrel has to be long enough to retain range and power. It should have iron sights as well as a scope because scopes break. It needs enough power to take out an unarmored target, human or animal, weighing in at 500 pounds. The sling should be able to support your arm during a shot, not just be a way to haul the weapon around. Bipods are okay, but Cooper felt they were almost useless in rough terrain and could become a dangerous crutch for a shooter to get addicted to.

A long-eye relief scope allows a shooter to hit a target at range while retaining their peripheral vision. (Okay, I know this is kind of a faux pas, but it’s the best way I can come up with to describe it. You know how when you’re playing Call of Duty on the X-Box, and you’re using a sniper rifle, and while you’re looking through the scope, some random asshole named HelloKitty@$$Face comes around the corner and tags you in the side of the head from like eight feet away because you couldn’t see him come up on you? That’s the reasoning behind the long eye relief scope. You can see the world around you and maintain situational awareness.)

snipercaption

Cooper was big on shooting with both eyes open, and with a low power scope mounted forward of the receiver, you can do that pretty well. It also makes it easier to load the weapon with a stripper clip, and you can hold the weapon around the receiver, the rifle’s center of gravity, when you’re hauling ass away from a bear big enough to laugh at .308. The downside is that it doesn’t do well in low-light conditions, and during sunrise and sunset you can get a glare off the glass that makes the scope useless.

So this is hardly just a rifle with a weird-looking scope. Cooper didn’t give a dump about making the rifle look nice. Function came before form, and yet the end results are pretty nice looking rifles. The Mannlicher Scout, a rifle Cooper approved of, has sleek lines and looks almost futuristic for a bolt-action rifle.

But should you get one of these general, all-purpose, do-anything, ass-kicking rifles designed by one of the most brilliant men in the firearms field since John Moses Browning descended from Heaven to present man with the 1911?

In a word, no.

In several words, allow me to explain. I’ve heard the scout rifle described as “a solution looking for a problem,” and unfortunately, in the modern world, that’s true. This is a frontiersman’s rifle. It’s a rifle you use when you don’t know what you’re going to shoot tomorrow, but it’s a pretty good bet you’re shooting something. On paper, that sounds great, but in the modern world, how many people live that life? What it excels at is doing everything “okay.” You can use it for hunting, but it’s not going to be as good as a regular hunting rifle. You can use it for defense, but it’s not going to be as good as an AR15.

Look, in the modern world, guns are like women’s shoes. There’s a right kind for every occasion, and even if a person doesn’t know Gunsite Scoutwhat kind of gun they want, they have a good idea in the back of their mind why they want a gun just like a woman may not know specifically what brand of shoes she needs, she knows she wants shoes for dancing at a wedding. So when a person says, “I want a gun,” they may not know what kind of gun they want, but they know they want a gun for a primary reason. If I live in a bad neighborhood, I want a gun for self defense. Do I get a scout rifle? If I want a gun to go hunting elk, do I want a scout rifle? A scout rifle could do those things, but not as well as a gun that’s designed to do those things, and in this day and age, 99 percent of shooters don’t need a gun that does everything.

“But, TJ, you bombastic simpleton, what’s the harm in getting a scout rifle if that’s what I want?” you ask.

Hey, I’m all for getting what you want. And you’re right, the above reason, in itself, is not enough to determine that a scout rifle is the wrong way to go. However, there’s another factor that, when combined with the above, makes me say no to a scout rifle.

The price.

The MSRP for a Ruger Gunsite Scout is about $1,000. A Mannlicher Scout, the over-the-counter rifle that comes closest to Cooper’s vision is $2,000. Custom-made scout rifles that accurately reflect Cooper’s concept can run past $4,000. For the price of a Mannlicher Scout, I could buy my AR15 ($1,000), my Ruger American ($380) and my FNP-9 ($500). That’s an awful lot of money for a bolt-action rifle that doesn’t hunt well during the morning hours when the deer are actually out and about.

I’m not trashing Cooper’s vision. I just think it came too late. The guys who explored the heart of Africa in the turn of the century probably would have been jazzed to have scout rifles with them. It’s the kind of rifle Teddy Roosevelt would have wanted to carry while wandering around the American west. But those frontiers aren’t frontiers anymore, and the scout rifle is a rifle that excels in a frontier.

This guy should probably have a scout rifle. But that’s because he’s living that life in one of the few places and few ways you still can.

Bearcaption


Like what you read?  GunNoob is now part of Pew Pew Tactical.  Check out the rest of our awesome resources: